<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: Wolfenstein</title>
	<atom:link href="http://egamer.co.za/2009/08/review-wolfenstein/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://egamer.co.za/2009/08/review-wolfenstein/</link>
	<description>South African Console &#38; Gaming News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:17:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tody</title>
		<link>http://egamer.co.za/2009/08/review-wolfenstein/comment-page-1/#comment-8551</link>
		<dc:creator>Tody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 14:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://egamer.co.za/?p=5664#comment-8551</guid>
		<description>Thanks itachi :) 
lol, Please don&#039;t make the spamming of my nick a &quot;thing&quot; now! :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks itachi :)<br />
lol, Please don&#8217;t make the spamming of my nick a &#8220;thing&#8221; now! :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Itachi-owns-all</title>
		<link>http://egamer.co.za/2009/08/review-wolfenstein/comment-page-1/#comment-8546</link>
		<dc:creator>Itachi-owns-all</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 13:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://egamer.co.za/?p=5664#comment-8546</guid>
		<description>Looks like a cool game and I don&#039;t say that for many FPS games. Nice review Tody...........Tody, Tody, Tody :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like a cool game and I don&#8217;t say that for many FPS games. Nice review Tody&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..Tody, Tody, Tody :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bukris</title>
		<link>http://egamer.co.za/2009/08/review-wolfenstein/comment-page-1/#comment-8526</link>
		<dc:creator>Bukris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 21:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://egamer.co.za/?p=5664#comment-8526</guid>
		<description>:D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>:D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tody</title>
		<link>http://egamer.co.za/2009/08/review-wolfenstein/comment-page-1/#comment-8525</link>
		<dc:creator>Tody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 09:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://egamer.co.za/?p=5664#comment-8525</guid>
		<description>@Bukris
That&#039;s my name, yes. :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Bukris<br />
That&#8217;s my name, yes. :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bukris</title>
		<link>http://egamer.co.za/2009/08/review-wolfenstein/comment-page-1/#comment-8522</link>
		<dc:creator>Bukris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 21:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://egamer.co.za/?p=5664#comment-8522</guid>
		<description>Tody Tody Tody Tody :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tody Tody Tody Tody :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tody</title>
		<link>http://egamer.co.za/2009/08/review-wolfenstein/comment-page-1/#comment-8506</link>
		<dc:creator>Tody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 06:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://egamer.co.za/?p=5664#comment-8506</guid>
		<description>Hey saidin
The star rating, for my reviews at least, isn&#039;t the actual score (I don&#039;t use numbered ratings), but rather the scorecard at the bottom of the article is the final verdict to my review. That said, I voice my thanks because now that you&#039;ve brought it up that there was a 7/10 rating, I realised I made a massive mistake. The final verdict was supposed to be &quot;Good&quot; and not &quot;Decent&quot; :/ Wow, didn&#039;t even realise when I posted the review...It&#039;s corrected 
now. I&#039;m really sorry for the mistake. 

Thanks for the heads up saidin. In correcting the scorecard rating, I guess the star rating also changes, but it would be preferred if you ignore it in my reviews, because, as I said above, my final verdict is at the end. :D

I agree with you fully, I also found the single player to be awesome and I said this in the review. I recommended it to people to get in my verdict, but not for the full price because A) it&#039;s only 7-8 hours and B) the online is not good at all in comparison to other competition and Wolfenstein: Enemy Territory. 

All in all, I did enjoy the game very much and would recommend it to any FPS fan to try out. Thanks again for bringing that up, because I honestly don&#039;t know how I made such a stupid mistake. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey saidin<br />
The star rating, for my reviews at least, isn&#8217;t the actual score (I don&#8217;t use numbered ratings), but rather the scorecard at the bottom of the article is the final verdict to my review. That said, I voice my thanks because now that you&#8217;ve brought it up that there was a 7/10 rating, I realised I made a massive mistake. The final verdict was supposed to be &#8220;Good&#8221; and not &#8220;Decent&#8221; :/ Wow, didn&#8217;t even realise when I posted the review&#8230;It&#8217;s corrected<br />
now. I&#8217;m really sorry for the mistake. </p>
<p>Thanks for the heads up saidin. In correcting the scorecard rating, I guess the star rating also changes, but it would be preferred if you ignore it in my reviews, because, as I said above, my final verdict is at the end. :D</p>
<p>I agree with you fully, I also found the single player to be awesome and I said this in the review. I recommended it to people to get in my verdict, but not for the full price because A) it&#8217;s only 7-8 hours and B) the online is not good at all in comparison to other competition and Wolfenstein: Enemy Territory. </p>
<p>All in all, I did enjoy the game very much and would recommend it to any FPS fan to try out. Thanks again for bringing that up, because I honestly don&#8217;t know how I made such a stupid mistake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: saidin</title>
		<link>http://egamer.co.za/2009/08/review-wolfenstein/comment-page-1/#comment-8505</link>
		<dc:creator>saidin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 22:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://egamer.co.za/?p=5664#comment-8505</guid>
		<description>Ok while I didn&#039;t read this review, I did play the game. I just looked at your score, and you seem to have gone with the trend of giving it like 7/10.

I personally really enjoyed the game. The story was engaging and the voice acting complemented it very nicely. I enjoyed the serious/joking balance between saving a town from destruction and Nazi&#039;s with flaming skulls.

I finished this on hard in around two days. The only part I found hard was the final fight (round 2, where the rockets kept gibbing me).

It&#039;s definitely not a 10/10, but I think 8-8.5 is better. It ran well, the AI was decent, and I didn&#039;t encounter any bugs. Add a fun storyline and good gameplay, and IMO it&#039;s hard to remove 3 stars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok while I didn&#8217;t read this review, I did play the game. I just looked at your score, and you seem to have gone with the trend of giving it like 7/10.</p>
<p>I personally really enjoyed the game. The story was engaging and the voice acting complemented it very nicely. I enjoyed the serious/joking balance between saving a town from destruction and Nazi&#8217;s with flaming skulls.</p>
<p>I finished this on hard in around two days. The only part I found hard was the final fight (round 2, where the rockets kept gibbing me).</p>
<p>It&#8217;s definitely not a 10/10, but I think 8-8.5 is better. It ran well, the AI was decent, and I didn&#8217;t encounter any bugs. Add a fun storyline and good gameplay, and IMO it&#8217;s hard to remove 3 stars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

