2,387 Views | 46 Comments

6 Games That Were Unfairly Bashed

6 Games That Were Unfairly Bashed

Gamers are gamers. They will always find any minuscule reason to whine and bitch about a little annoyance in a game that is so insignificant that it’s hardly noteworthy. In some cases these little annoyances or discrepancies blow up into one giant miasma of idiocy and mass hysteria. Exhibit A: Mass Effect 3 ending. But we will get to that later. These complaints often don’t do the game in question any justice and distracts people from the big picture. Often a game is glorious and thought-provoking and gets overshadowed by negative influences from so-called “die-hard gamers”.

Let’s look at some of the games that received negative reactions that were totally not deserved at all.

 

6 — FEZ
6-6-fez

Racism is a very touchy subject. So touchy in fact that you can’t say a single thing wrong about another race group without being totally massacred by the media, racial groups and just trolls in general. Phil Fish, the lead developer of FEZ, mentioned in a GDC panel that Japanese games suck. This got misinterpreted as racist against Japanese people when in actual fact he just stated his opinion that modern Japanese games suck to him. What is the fallout of this action? Internet “elites” calling him a racist with a plethora of like-minded idiots  just jumping on the bandwagon despite the fact that most people on forums say what he has said every day almost. Now FEZ is a good game , no doubt about that, but people are flat-out refusing to buy the game based on one simple statement made by one man.

I’m sorry, but is just fucking stupid to me. It wasn’t just Phil Fish designing the game, no, it was a group of people working their fingers to the bone to produce a game worthy of significant praise. Now all their effort gets wasted because one guy made a mistake? What are we, animals?

 

5 — L.A. Noire
6-5-la-noire

This is a prime example of my personally coined phrase “gamer amnesia”. I was lucky enough to receive this game on release (for which I spent a shitload of money because I’m a fan of Rockstar‘s games) and was totally hooked by it. Detective games weren’t a new thing, but this was so well done that it became unique in its own sense. The facial expressions were beautifully crafted and designed to pull you into the game. I was filled with immersion and even found myself questioning my relatives and friends while reading their facial expressions. I was seeing praise left and right. From people on Twitter, various reviews and the amount of people that were playing it on my friends list. A few months passed and whenever the topic of L.A. Noire came up in social media or whatever, gamers were suddenly bashing it mercilessly.

Why? BECAUSE LOL. Actually it was always something idiotic like “Oh, the facial animations weren’t that great” or “The story actually sucked now that I think about it” and so an and so forth. I was literally shocked at the negativity that was given off because I loved the game and still loved it even after getting a 1000 G for it (GSW Alert). What happened? I’ll tell you what happened. Gamers completely forgot about the amazing experience they had and started agreeing with a bunch of idiots that said the game was bad for some fucked up convoluted reason. This doesn’t paint the game well for people that have yet to play it and in turn they miss out on one hell of an experience.

Sad. Sad indeed.

 

4 — Dragon Age 2
6-4-dragon-age-2

We all love him and we all would marry his face. The favorite game of our infamous space pirate Caveshen. He has been defending Dragon Age 2 since it came out and with good reason. Gamers have went so far as calling it the worst game they have ever played, but with as much evidence as a homeless guy’s hygiene. In my honest opinion you can only ever truly scrutinize a game if you have completely finished it.

This became apparent to me when I played a little under the radar JRPG called Tales of Vesperia. At first I didn’t like the game at all and only ever enjoyed the combat. I played off and on for weeks with only an hour or so of play time. As I progressed, it started to draw me into its storyline and characters in a way I never expected. From thinking the game was kinda shit to being close to addicted to it is evidence enough that you can’t undermine a game before you truly played it.

cwda2 This is exactly what happened to Dragon Age 2. People didn’t play as far as the prologue and then subsequently called it a load of rancid piss. That’s not fair now is it? I played the game twice and while it not being my favorite BioWare game of all time, I still thoroughly enjoyed it. Character interactions and relationships had me so sucked in that I frankly didn’t give a fuck about recycled dungeons and the fact that the game is only based in one city.

It’s obvious that Dragon age 2 is hated by many, but almost 90% of the supposed haters can’t even justify their hatred towards the game because they couldn’t even be arsed to play the damn game in its entirety.

 

3 — Bulletstorm
6-3-bulletstorm

This is from another phenomenon that I’ve subsequently called the “Too Damn High Expectation Phenomena”. The game was developed by Epic and when gamers thing Epic they instantly think of my Epic Guitar Hero skills. And Gears of War I guess. When Bulletstorm was announced people looked forward to the same type of quality they usually get from an Epic game. This was not the case with Bulletstorm, but, – and this is a huge but –  it did things right in other departments. Bulletstorm is a vulgar, humourous First Person Shooter with interesting scoring mechanics thrown into the fray.

That’s all it was. Not a spiritual predecessor to Gears of War where Grayson Hunt is secretly Marcus Fenix’s long lost brother or whatever. Bulletstorm did its own thing and did it well at that. It was a sad day when I saw internet discussions pop up that portrayed Bulletstorm as a shit game full of “gimmicks” and “clichés”. No, it wasn’t. It had its own universe, own style of humour and completely different ideas of where it was going. Gamers were just not pleased with anything other than the majesty that was Gears of War.

Bulletstorm was hell of a lot of fun and something completely different to what I was used to. I’d much prefer playing something like this to the tried-and-tested likes of Call of Duty or Medal of Honor.

But I guess that just wasn’t enough for “hardcore” gamers.

 

2 — Mass Effect 3
6-2-mass-effect-3

Sigh. I really am over this whole debacle with regards to the ending. Weeks and weeks of angry forum posts and heated arguments over a 10 minute sequence of actions and cutscenes was enough to drive me completely bonkers. To be completely fair, Mass Effect 3 did not deserve all this negativity at all.

It all started with the whole Day 1 DLC deal. People were outraged at the idea and decided that they “HAD ENOUGH” and proceeded to boycott the game (Which they didn’t) and attacked the game on sites such as Metacritic, giving it absolutely abysmal scores. To be fair it was a bit of a low-blow to us as gamers, but nothing so drastic that it deserved total scrutinization and hatred. Many games have done it before and just because it was Mass Effect, suddenly it’s stepping over the line.

Then there was the ending. Entire sites dedicated to it? Petition signings? Facebook groups laughably called “Retake Mass Effect”? Really guys?  Was this really necessary now? Also, it seems that the so-called “fans” of Mass Effect suddenly just dropped the entire experience they had throughout the entire 40+ hour game and only focused on the final scene. This doesn’t do the game justice at all. There were some amazing set-pieces and brilliantly told stories left right and centre. What happened to that? On ALL the opinion pieces and 10 000 word essays I’ve read concerning the ending I never saw a mention given to how amazing the game in itself was.

Just a load of whiny bitchy gamers.

 

1 — Deadly Premonition
6-1-deadly-premonition

I’ve ranted significantly in this article and I’d like to cool things down a bit with a game that I think everyone should play. I bought this game for R100 on the  Games on Demand store on Xbox LIVE and got my mind blown to pieces. The game is bad. Horrible even. The graphics are that of the PS2 era, controls are one big mess (for example you reverse your car with the RIGHT TRIGGER. How the… I don’t even), character animations are laughable, stupid things happen to the geometry, combat is unsatisfying and retarded.

But you know what? This game has attitude and spark. Throughout the time I’ve played it, I was treated with humorous dialogue at almost every conversation. The characters were bursting with uniqueness and personality, like a transvestite deputy sheriff and a rich guy with a gas mask speaking in rhymes and eating turkey cereal sandwiches . There were pop culture reverences made that shocked me, like the lead character talking about the movie Rise of the Killer Tomatoes and Tom and Jerry. Everything is quirky as hell and that made the experience totally worth every minute I spent it on.

You know what could have prevented me from not having that experience? Just giving up at the prologue because of the faults I’ve mentioned and that’s what most gamers do. They just give up. Not interested in discovering something new and exciting because they have grown used to just being handed something on a silver plater. That’s why Call of Duty is so popular. It’s simple, quick to pick up and fun. The gamer who looks for challenging experiences or new worlds outside their comfort zone are dying out

And I don’t like that.

 

In Conclusion

I’ve started this article because I was downright pissed off at gamers just moaning and bitching the whole time. It would be justified if a game is truly crap and shallow without any hint of creativity. That kind of bitching I understand because it makes sense to do so. Not undermining a game based on foggy evidence or mass hysteria. We need to shut that out of this industry and truly appreciate the great games that are seldom given to us.

Sometimes it’s good to be up in arms about an issue you have in a game, but it needs to be justified and from personal experience. Not just jumping on a bandwagon with a bunch of trolls and idiots.

I don’t know if I just have a soft spot for games and tend to go easy on them, but I will say this:

I’m a gamer and I’m passionate about my chosen entertainment.

Give games a decent chance and you might find yourself surprised or even hooked.

If You Liked This, You Should Try These!

Name: Marko Swanepoel
Location: Vereeniging
Position: Author, Features & Columns

  • http://egamer.co.za/ Azhar Amien

    Agreed with L.A Noire and FEZ. I loved LA Noire, thought it was good but also could have had more variety. Very immersive though. Half-half agreed with Bulletstorm, because while it was fun, it didn’t utilise its kill system nearly as well as it should have. It mostly became “you can do these skill kills in this environment, now do them for bonus xp” which diminished the player freedom. It was a decent game for me, but I felt it could have been a lot better.

    I’m half-half agreed with Mass Effect 3, because I thoroughly enjoyed the experience but I don’t hold anything against fans outraged at the ending. I certainly hated it. And the main reason it put me off is because I’m not walking away satisfied remembering Mass Effect for all the good, my lasting impression is just frustration.

    However, I completely disagree with Dragon Age 2 and find it incredibly surprising that you’re not sure why people hate it. Wow, I could write a book on why exactly. I can debate with your other 5 titles, but really, I don’t think a great argument can be formed as to why people are wrong to dislike Dragon Age 2. I’ll give it a shot anyway, since I never tire of hating on Dragon Age 2 :D I played it almost 40 hours and finished it, so I think I’m quite qualified to speak about it. I’ll summarise the main reasons why I believe it’s a terrible game.

    1. In the very same year, RPGs infinitely better than it came out, yet it still received high ratings. At least it did end up losing fans. Anyway, RPGs maybe not better in terms of personal preference, but undeniably in quality. Namely the Witcher 2, Dark Souls, Skyrim, Deus Ex: Human Revolution (although you could argue this as more of an action game). Not to mention indie titles like Bastion.

    2. Copy pasted environments and repeated visiting of bland and identical areas in such a repetitive small, graphically unimpressive world is unforgivable. It’s lazy, half-assed work. There’s no way to justify it. Despite that, there were loading screens everywhere. At least they looked better than the game.

    3. Generic characters in your party who have zero depth or interest compared to Origins’ cast. You can’t talk to characters on the road or whenever you want to, like you could in Origins. Visiting them in their houses is stupid. There were absolutely no drawbacks for party members hating or loving you, like in Origins, because of Dragon Age 2′s retarded ally or rivalry system, where either way they get a buff. That’s just lazy. There’s hardly any impact on you or on the storyline.

    4. The dialogue system was robotic and atrocious when it came to romance options. “Select heart” effectively sums up the entirety of the depth of the romance system. It was empty, and lame. It’s not possible to think of a more simple and empty dialogue system. Showing icons that tell you exactly what response you’re making, compared to Origins’ many dialogue options, was disturbing. I wondered if Dragon Age 2 thought I was a moron, or that I couldn’t read or interpret anything for myself.

    5. No epic dragon fights whatsoever, barely any good boss fights, no cinematic slow kills like in Dragon Age Origins. Combat was simplified, which would have been fine had it not been such a painful chore. Repeatedly fighting waves of 20 weak enemies at every turn did nothing but bore the living hell out of me and unnecessarily extend game time. It was hugely repetitive, dull and it wasn’t nearly as tactical or challenging as Origins. I would have thought after 20 hours the retarded game would have been convinced that I can kill its weaklings, but it never tired of sending them at me. I also hated the Dragon Ball Z rage style of fighting, I much preferred the realistic sword play in Origins where using a great sword and heavy armour actually slowed you down.

    6. The story was uninteresting, and I was not invested in it at all. It was one of the most uninspired, empty RPGs I’ve ever played. I barely got to create my own character, there was so much more depth in Origins where you could determine what race you were, what kind of person you were and how people viewed you. Not possible in Dragon Age 2. You’re forced to be a human with “hawke” as your name. There’s no motivation whatsoever to think about any of your decisions, as there was barely anything significant to do. Your party members certainly don’t care at all, and gain a buff either way.

    7. Lack of custmisation and limited variety in all areas of the game. You couldn’t even change your party members’ armour or clothes. Talk about lazy. Effectively repeating the same damn combat with the same-looking characters against armies of the same-looking enemies in the same-looking environments is never what I would expect from a quality RPG. It’s what I expect from a forgettable and mediocre game, or just plain trash. Fitting for Dragon Age 2 in my opinion.

    Dragon Age 2 was not a great role playing game, not a great action game and it didn’t have a good story. The best it does really is drown time, or waste it. It can be addictive, but that’s about it. Origins was an infinitely better game. It was an insult to me as a fan of the original game, and only the Lord above knows why I wasted my time playing it for longer than an hour.

    That’s not even everything I hate about it. But you said haters can’t justify, so you forced me into it :P

    <3

    • http://twitter.com/MGTHABO Marko Swanepoel

      Dude, I understand the hate because we all have opinions right? Like me. I fucking hated Dark Souls and people keep on praising the game. All those faults are well and good, but some people choose to look past them because they like the universe their in. All those things you mentioned didn’t even bother me when I played it because I didn’t really care about it.

      ‘Oh this dungeon looks familiar. Isn’t it the exact same one? O well let’s get on with it I want to slay some goddamn skeleton’s’ I didn’t sit there for 2 hours going “THIS IS A BETRAYAL!” 

      As for the characters, they are like real people. Some people would think the dwarf is a prick and others would think he’s a sweetheart. People have different feelings for individuals and sometimes it’s all negative.

      Each their own, but the point I was trying to make is that people should stop fucking whining about it. 

    • http://egamer.co.za/ Azhar Amien

      All good, I was just looking for a distraction from studying :P And raging about Dragon Age 2 eased things. Like I said it’s all fine if you like Dragon Age 2, but to say most people aren’t justified got me a bit jelly seeing as how it can be factually proven when it comes to its quality :D

      Are people still whining about it? o_O The game came out March last year didn’t it? As far as I see I’m the only one who gets a real kick out of insulting it :D

    • http://twitter.com/Clones694 Akshar Sunichur

       Dude…wtf? Why do you love hating on stuff?

    • http://egamer.co.za/ Azhar Amien

      So that when I love something, it is real and super special awesome. <3

      No homo.

    • http://twitter.com/Clones694 Akshar Sunichur

      Hmm makes sense. Your comment was almost as long as the article. Kinda freaked me out a bit.

    • http://egamer.co.za/ Azhar Amien

      Hahaha it was only that long because I was trying to get away from studying :P So it was a nice break. Plus Marko “poked the bear” by saying haters haven’t justified their hatred for Dragon Age 2.

      But in any case, I used to always look for the positives in games, but I was changed and made evil over the years. There are perks though. When a true gem comes along I appreciate it to no end and love it like I love chocolate ice-cream. Being overly critical and having high standards can be a sad road, but there are unlimited rewards in finding something awesome and being impressed :P

  • Treble

    Dragon Age 2 was a piece of trash I fully agree

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=720787108 Charl Den Dulk

    Sorry but Mass Effect 3 is a big steaming pile of crap, not because of flawed design or the actual game itself but because of the massive amount of cock-ups by Bioware and EA. Why release DLC on day 1 when it was obvious what the reaction to it would be? Why promise us a big reveal for Tali after playing the 2 other games only to get a stock image found in google modified by some armature in photo shop. Really? Not to mention the amount of advertising telling us that our choices would matter but in the end none of them did really matter. And a ending so “smart” it managed to outsmart itself. 

    But I digress it was more important sending copies into space and putting review sites reviewers in the game to really care about the actual game. After spending so much time with the franchise playing the first and second game to be shafted so hard in the 3rd has really disappointed me when the developers promised us so much but has delivered so little in the end, which is a real pity.    

    • Timothy

      If you’re suggesting the entirety of ME3 was bad then something is really wrong upstairs, you should get that checked out.

      And all your issues with ME3, well they’re about as tired and uninspired as the rest of the ragers (yawn).

  • Rezenu

    Ninja Gaiden 3 should be on this list too. While the game isn’t perfect, the media went too far with the bashing.

  • zenihilist

    So your problem with Mass Effect 3 fans dissatisfied with the ending is that they “ALL” then write off the entire game as being terrible? You commit the very same flaw by labeling “ALL” complaining comments as not mentioning the good parts of the game. You must have carefully avoided the many that do take a balanced view. I made some myself,and saw even more by others. You use a small sample to characterize a whole and are guilty of the same failing that you complain of. You also fail to understand that the first 95% of the game being SO good is a huge contributing factor towards making the ending so much worse than it otherwise might have been. That said, at least you’re trying to contextualize the controversy, which is understandable. Its better than some of the outwardly dismissive commentary I’ve read.

    Now I don’t wanna get off on a rant here, but the Mass Effect series came within groping distance of being the most gripping, emotionally powerful story in the history of gaming, only to fail so badly at the last moment that it defies comprehension. Its hard to not think that Bioware designed the ending intentionally as a gesture of contempt towards fans (no A, B, C endings, but cinnamon, mint, and ocean breeze endings, nailed it!). So they were at least indifferent. Yeah, people might take a little offense at that. This is not about a game getting a bad wrap, this is about settling once and for all whether or not storytelling matters in games (SPOILER: it does). It is also about the relationship of the gamer to the industry. Do we shut up and accept bad content under the unwritten laws of art? This is not a painting hanging in a gallery, it’s a game intended to satisfy the audience in order to make money. My money. Our money. That means we get to have expectations and a reasonable trust that they will be largely met. When this trust is perceived to have been abused, that means we get to complain and protest (legally and nonviolently, of course) as loud and as long as we want until we are satisfied or give up. I love the game, and the series. That’s why I want the ending to measure up. Of course that’s just my I opinion, I could be wrong.

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=720787108 Charl Den Dulk

      Don’t get me wrong, like I stated I loved the series up and till the end of the 2nd game. And by reading the promises that were made by the developer I was expecting another brilliant game. But those promises never came to fruition. As for the games ending I am not asking them to change their ending thus changing their vision of the game, I am asking they should expand on it, closure to all your decisions and choices you made during the game. The very same thing we got promised but never got, that is the least they can do for fans of their franchise the very same fans who brought them were they are today.

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=720787108 Charl Den Dulk

      Here is a nice decision chart showing what I am on about: http://1.media.dorkly.cvcdn.com/42/52/c35fc7c0628263b6c5c560774260a1ea.jpg

  • http://twitter.com/MGTHABO Marko Swanepoel

    Whoops I said something good about Mass Effect 3 and Dragon Age. Guess I’m ruined. 

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=720787108 Charl Den Dulk

      Oh don’t get me wrong, I loved Dragon Age 2 and enjoyed it far more than Dragon Age 1, because the developers actually produced a game based off the promises and comments they made to us as gamers.

    • RedRedSuit

      See, this isn’t a real response.  I don’t mean to troll you, but it’s this kind of stuff that shows your editorial is not an argument but a rant, nothing more.  It’s disingenuous to play the martyr.  No one has any problem with saying some nice things about DA2 and ME3.  Dismissing valid criticisms as “idiotic” “whining,” yeah, that’s a problem.

  • RedRedSuit

    Wow.  I don’t know where to begin with this editorial.  I mean, I’d be right there with you if you simply had said that gamers can be extremely whiney and nitpicky over the smallest things that don’t really matter, or that they use horrible tactics like bombing Metacritic user scores, or filing FTC complaints (!) over game endings.  I’d have been right there with you.

    But then you had to go and use some of the worst possible examples to support this, by picking at least 3 games that were actually FAIRLY criticized.  Leaving Fez, DP, and Bulletstorm alone (since I haven’t played them), let’s look at the 3 games you actually use as examples.

    LA Noire.  Holy shit.  Talk about a game that was unfairly *praised*.  89 Metacritic score?  With a story like that?  Talk about a game that falls apart halfway through never to recover.  Yes, the game looked amazing.  Yes, it was incredibly stylish.  And yes, it had huge promise.  But did it deliver on this promise?  Hell no.  Nothing in the 2nd half of the game made any sense.  All the characterizations fell apart.  The ending was a steaming pile.  The gameplay was quite stale, especially with the constant pointless chases.  LA Noire is a great example of a game that has lots of great parts to it but is not a very good whole.  So when people actually play it for themselves and see that they don’t like it, THAT’s bad?  This game was not an “amazing experience.”  If you thought it was, great, but to attack people for disliking a game when they disagree with you — that’s nonsense.  I’m pretty sure when I was playing the game, I was not having a “great experience” past the halfway point, so it’s kind of insulting to imply that I loved it but only decided it was meh due to groupthink.

    “I was literally shocked at the negativity that was given off because I loved the game and still loved it even after getting a 1000 G for it (GSW Alert). What happened? I’ll tell you what happened. Gamers completely forgot about the amazing experience they had and started agreeing with a bunch of idiots that said the game was bad for some fucked up convoluted reason.”

    So what you’re saying is that any criticism (even entirely valid ones, like the fact that the story in this game blew) is “idiotic” if you don’t agree with it.  And if you don’t agree with it, then (since only your opinion is the right one, even when in the minority) the only possible explanation is that they must be influenced by some other outside party — and not really having that impossible critical opinion that disagrees with you.

    Dragon Age II.  Another commenter up there wrote a nice essay on why he didn’t like this game.  Your response?  ”I don’t really care about it” or “don’t give a fuck” about those reasons.  How is that a counterargument?  Which one is the one being unreasonable?  

    People didn’t like DA II because it was far, far, far, far below the standard of BioWare’s other games and its immediate predecessor.  It is therefore criticized for completely valid reasons.  Let me say that again: COMPLETELY VALID, and your article does NOTHING — and I mean NOTHING — to actually dispute that.  Doesn’t mean you have to agree, but it’s “idiotic” to feel that way?  Of course, in your argument you make the well known fallacy of attacking the extremes of an argument (like people who didn’t even really play it, or those calling it the “worst” game ever).  It’s invalid and dishonest, because you know perfectly well that most HUGE BioWare fans that did in fact play through it disliked it strongly.  So you just attack the fringes of the argument, because it’s easy, instead of trying to attack those that could actually fight back.

    This isn’t some vocal minority situation.  The game got some of the lowest scores for a BioWare game, and all but a tiny percentage of the people that played through this game actually thought it was up to snuff.

    Mass Effect 3.  Once again, you attack the fringes of the argument instead of the mainstream.  Yes, FTC complaints are lame.  Yes, petitions are lame.  But go on NeoGAF into the ending thread — you’ll see the vast majority of new finishers coming into the thread and going, “this game was amazing… what the fuck happened?”.  People praise 99% of ME3 *all the time*.  Why do you think people are so upset at that awful ending?  It damages the game, and the entire series.  I’m playing through ME1 one, and it’s hard to take any of the plot seriously, because it’s so inconsistent with that ending.  THAT’s why it’s such a big deal, whereas the many other bad game endings aren’t.  Yet you attack those fans (yes, fans, not “fans”) for being so in love with the series as to actually care about something as “insignificant” as the damn ending.

    All in all, at least half of your article amounts no nothing more than “People disagree with my opinion, so they’re fucking idiots.”

    • http://twitter.com/MGTHABO Marko Swanepoel

      Hell where do you people find time to write these things. These are the points I wanted to make:

      1. Dragon Age 2:

      People criticize the game based on about 1 hour of play time, Those people are fucking idiots.

      2. L.A. Noire
      Gamer amnesia. People hopped on the bandwagon saying the game sucked when previously they praised the game all high and mighty.

      3. Mass Effect 3:
      Gamers were so caught up in the whole ending thing that they just threw out the entire experience all together. 

      I’m not saying people that disagree with me are idiots, but they are idiots if they do the shit I mentioned above. That is all I said. 

      I might have thrown in a couple of praises for the game because I liked it, but that’s just my personal taste. 

      I attack the fringes because they are the rotting cancer of the gaming industry. 

  • http://twitter.com/Sons_O_Liberty SonsOfLiberty

    WOW, 2 of those games deserve the bashing.  Mass Effect 3 is the worst ending to a video game in HISTORY, and no the bashing will not stop and I for once NOT stop.  Never has a game pissed me off SO much and CaV1E can attest to that  I guess the people that “are okay” with love having plot holes, nothing making sense at the end….Dragon Age II and O did for awhile and it got sorted…I don’t ever remember seeing LA Noire bashed at all.  Now lets get back to Mass Effect 3 shall we?

    A logical breakdown of why Mass Effect 3 ending make zero sense.

    Read the document here:  https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QT4IUepvrU1pfv_B95oQj0H84DlCTUmzQ_uQh1voTUs/preview?pli=1&sle=true

    Disclaimer:
    This ain’t geek nitpicking – just basic logic and reason accessible to
    any rational person paying moderate attention to the events depicted
    on-screen!

    CONTENTS

    1. Nothing Regarding the Assault on the Citadel Conduit Makes Any Sense

    2. Every Single Line of Dialogue Spoken by Anderson is Impossible or Extremely Implausible

    3. The Confrontation with The Illusive Man Makes No Sense to Where it Seems Intentionally Surreal

    4.
    Every Single Thing the Child Says is Utterly Crazy, Makes Absolutely No
    Sense, and Directly Contradicts Previously Established Major Plot
    Points and Facts

    • http://twitter.com/MGTHABO Marko Swanepoel

      Geez I thought the ending to My Horse and Me was the worst, but I guess my life was a lie all along…

    • CodeDisQus

      Well were playing in a game where hot blue chick lived for over a 1000 years and big elephants dudes went to war with VIs…… So the idea of synthetic and organic life forms becoming one isn’t that far off if you ask me…

  • http://twitter.com/Sons_O_Liberty SonsOfLiberty

    Yeup you lead a sheltered life…

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=720787108 Charl Den Dulk

    I have no issue with people shooting down games I enjoy, hell I have enjoyed games that got sub 70% scores, the enjoyment I get out of my games aren’t relative to those who either do or don’t enjoy the game.

  • Timothy

    OMG, can we please please please stop bitching and whining about ME3, for the love of Freeman. Some of us are trying to enjoy being a gamer.

    • http://twitter.com/MGTHABO Marko Swanepoel

      Timothy, I know I promised myself I will lead a life under the code of NoHomo, but you just made it real for me…

      I love you.

    • Timothy

       Love you to man XD

    • http://egamer.co.za/ Azhar Amien

      Tim, that’s all well and good, but if someone writes up a piece TELLING people they’re bitchy for bitching about Mass Effect 3…how do you not expect people to start bitching about Mass Effect 3?

  • http://www.facebook.com/Mounce2 Jason Mounce

     Nier – It’s got a metacritic score of like, 67 right now….

    Nier had a great soundtrack, great voice acting, a great story, its visuals weren’t ‘BALLS ON THE WALLS’ but its total experience was neglected but truly a masterpiece. Everyone who’s played it unlike the Reviewers knows what I’m talking about, you look at all the user reviews on Nier and its all 9 or 10 out of 10. ‘PROFESSIONAL’ reviews? Garbage.

  • http://twitter.com/Sons_O_Liberty SonsOfLiberty

    Well the thing is most “so called “legit” gaming” sites are not legit but are payed off, it’s hard to believe them, hell Metacritic got “busted” for deleted Mass Effect 3 user reviews, and with CHobot being in ME3 its not hard to figure that one out :P

     Timothy sorry your trying to be a gamer, but so am I, and when a game completely throw your balls in your own face, and makes it totally un-inteligable, then you have a right to mad, there is “no end” to ME3, it’s just sort of pinned on.There are many many many plot holes and “fans” have a right to be upset by it.  Some will disagree with me, but that’s the way it goes, I’m not mad, but for instance, say you got to the end of Call Of Duty, and the bad buy was Mario, would that make sense to you?

    • Timothy

      If I got to the end of COD and the bad guy was Mario I’d shrug, maybe giggle and then I’d move onto the next game. Gaming is done and games are played for the sole intent of enjoying them, so I remember the good times and disregard the bad; It’s easy, just chill and stop getting so bent out of shape.

      Like with Mass Effect 3. I finished the game, told myself the end could’ve been better but 99% of the game was still just about the best gaming experience a Sci-fi RPG fan could’ve had, so why would I get angry? No one’s perfect, no developer is perfect and no game will ever be perfect; let it go, you’re only ruining it for yourself.

      And you can defend your anger all you want, but at the end of the day it’s inefficient, ruins the experience for everyone else around you and is all of it worth it? I mean I’m enjoying my hobby a lot more than you it seems. And just because someone isn’t kicking all their shit over in a rage doesn’t mean they aren’t critical. I’m doing my masters on the concepts and gameplay of video games, I stay in contact with some developers and like any good gamer, I maintain a intellectual opinion and have considered and put forward many critiques of the games I play. The difference, and instead having a tantrum, I provide collected and unbiased (rage free) critique that is useful; then I go back to my gaming and have a blast. Life’s too short dude.

      And that link, not really sure what you’re getting at, just shows how many gamers think they’re the centers of the universe.

    • http://egamer.co.za/ Azhar Amien

      Timothy, you missed one major thing in your comment: that’s YOU!

      Other people, like me, are entirely different. How does that make them wrong, or even you wrong? If you don’t feel the need to get angry or you’re happy with disregarding the bad and not making a fuss, then why shouldn’t others have the right to?

      Anger is inefficient? What about gamers’ discontent towards Mass Effect actually getting BioWare come out and talk about it and admit they made a mistake? What about Dark Souls for the PC getting influenced by gamer discontent? How does it ruin the experience for anyone around? You don’t have to hang around people complaining about the game. You can easily hang around people who love it or are playing it.

      Just because many gamers “throw a tantrum” doesn’t make all the others with valid criticisms suddenly become invalid. 

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=720787108 Charl Den Dulk

      So you eat 99% of your cake and you take a final bite out of the last 1% and you find a roach in it. But that is okay because instead of taking it back you finish it since the other 99% was still fine…..

    • Timothy

      I never said don’t criticize or protest, and I never said you can’t criticize; in fact, and if you actually read my shizzle, you’d know I encourage critique. I said it’s a good thing. The problem is when people think raging, attacking and moaning is a critique, they are not one and the same thing. And what I actually said was chill out, it’s long over. And the problem is most ragers did not criticize or provide anything useful, all they did was jump on every forum, post or wall where positive criticism was made and flame it into oblivion. Every time I watch a new vid, want to read a new post and then make some comments, I get buried in flame because I have something positive to say; and I’m not talking about eGamer. Then you get that lawsuit bs, which if it was successful, would’ve screwed so many media standards that assist us, the consumer.

      Besides, it’s not just Mass Effect, this shit happens so often and so much positive gaming is lost to the hordes of rage haters. If someone has something negative to say, say it and let that be that. Do you know there was a group of hackers trying to invade and attack the ME3 multiplayer servers to “teach Bioware a lesson”, I mean WTF?

    • Sons_O_Liberty

      Timothy, do not get me wrong I see you point, and I agree with most of it, and yes the “lawsuit” stuff and false advertising was way way way over the line, stupidity. With the way social media is and gamers getting older, it changes the whole outlook of the way things are discussed. I’ve been playing games since the “Nintendo” and I can’t ever remember one game being talked about as much as this one.  Other games were for not so much the game but what was being done to it, eg Assassins Creed with the online DRM which you must be connected tot he internet and I think Dark Souls for PC is trying something of the same, Ghost Recon Future Solider (Ubisoft) for PC actually decided against it.  And your talking about raging and tanterms, I have been cool and looked it from all sides, and tried to give criticism in a civil way, or at least I thought I had…I have never kicked anything over lol, and I’m actually still playing the game, the game in itself is the best I’ve ever played and I just don’t understand the last 20-30 minutes and I’ve read so many articles, if I would have been able to understand the ending (like many others) I doubt it would have even been a issue. I’ve actually have “meaningful” conversations with developers from Bioware on Twitter, eg Mike Gamble for instance…and he knew what I thought, but he replied to me quite a few times, and we’ve talked a very stand up guy and does not deserve what most tweet or say on BSN or Facebook or wherever.  I don’t follow these campaigns either, none of that, I just read articles and post them on Twitter if they are good enough, but also talk about other games. I’ve moved on from the end and starting playing it again, actually did replay it, and played some more, and most people who feel the same are actually doing the same,so I think that’s a testament of how remarkable the game is.  It’s in my top 5 list, also Final Fantasy XIII-2 was around the same with ending wise (I enjoyed this game immencly can’t wait for the Lightning DLC), I won’t go into detail in case someone is reading and won’t get spoiled.  I’ve never flamed anyone over their point of view of it what so ever, everyone is entitled to their opinions.  I’ve tried convincing CaV1E for awhile now, and he’s having none of it and he’s tried the same with me and has written some out-standing articles here on that fact.  I’ve only made a few posts on BSN (BioWare Social Network), which BSN is pretty cool site, just got to own a game and will have access to the site.  To that end, I was merely giving my opinion, yes I get you don’t agree that’s fine, but I like to discuss games/gaming in general, CaV1E and I have many times, but he always powns me, and try not to piss people off, I guess I did tonight on Twitter by just giving a opinion.  So hopefully no offense meant.  Oh the Google DOC was just observations is all, many people worked on it and edited and that was just some constructive critisism…thanks for reading.

  • http://twitter.com/TyrannikosCH Christian Munnerlyn

    In this article: “Your opinions differ than mine, therefore you are all morons.”
    I agree on a lot of your points, but this just comes off as egotistical.

    • http://twitter.com/MGTHABO Marko Swanepoel

      Give me examples please. 

    • RedRedSuit

      “started agreeing with a bunch of idiots that said the game was bad for some fucked up convoluted reason”

      There’s a direct one.

      But really the entire article is a veiled form of the same thing.

    • http://twitter.com/MGTHABO Marko Swanepoel

      Misunderstanding. Let me put it in better terms. “They started agreeing with a small bunch of haters and subsequently started hating the game they previously liked, for some fucked up convoluted reason” Better? 

      In retrospect, I could have put that in a better way and not seem biased, which I’m really not. Hell if I had to give LA Noire a rating right now I would give it 8.5/10. I still had valid reasons why I didn’t think the game was perfect. Now everyone is jumping on my back because I said the facial animations were kinda cool and the story wasn’t that bad to me. 

      Give it a fucking break and stop with the hating. 

      Also, don’t misinterpret some of my “egotistical” comments with that of light hearted jokes. Is the world so full of negativity to you that you have to attack a writer that jokingly said he is good at Guitar Hero? 

  • Rudolf_Venter
  • Schuby

    I’m very glad that I came across this article because I’m also annoyed with all the hate towards games purely because of either personal reasons or just the bandwagon affect. CoD is another game that gets too much hipocritical hate, because while I didn’t entirely like the last version of CoD it isn’t anything I would post about. I believe that a lot of the hate towards popular games is related to “gaming hipsters” and the bandwagon affect. The only game that I absolutely hate, not because of the game itself, but because of the enormous expectations I had for it is Brink. Honestly, it wasn’t the gameplay that did it for me, it was the seemingly rushed development. It had an amazing concept idea and executed the smooth motion (par core) idea well. The fist mission I played was great, I thought that it was going to be the game of the year at that point. Then I realized that the next 7 missions were basically the same objects as the first. The next thing I realized was that the second half of the campaign was in fact the same exact missions I had just played, just on the other team. After the campaign flopped for me I tried multiplayer… Where I realized I was just playing the Sam exact missions as the campaign story line, just with more people. I was thoroughly disappointed and to this day think of it as my least favorite game, but this is a good example of your over expectation theory

  • Yashaar Mall

    LOL

  • Yashaar Mall

    Trollbait mania Thabo.

    • http://twitter.com/MGTHABO Marko Swanepoel

      That’s why I do it :) So much discussion, it’s brilliant!

  • http://egamer.co.za/author/cavie Caveshen “CaViE” Rajman

    Still a better love story than Twilight. 

    • http://egamer.co.za/ Azhar Amien

      Still a better ending than Mass Effect 3.